Uber’s Didi Exposure Signals Bumps Ahead

Uber’s Didi Exposure Signals Bumps Ahead

Risk Disclaimer >>
Ad disclosure Fintech-Insight stands firm in its mission to facilitate sound financial decisions for you. We forge alliances with specialists to provide the latest in news and facts. Engagement with designated links, sponsored entries, products and/or services, leading transfers to brokers, or promotional content might entail financial recompense for us. We pledge to protect our users from any negative repercussions arising from utilizing our site. Be informed that no content hosted here should be interpreted as authoritative in legal, tax, investment, financial matters or any expert counsel; it is meant for informational purposes exclusively. Should there be any concerns, securing the guidance of an independent financial consultant is recommended.

In investing, in valuation, on Wall Street in general, assets can become liabilities (and vice versa) in a moment.

That’s especially true when one firm owns a stake in another, and by the laws of corporate structure, is entitled to share in the profits, the fortunes, or in some cases, the misfortunes of their strategic or financial holdings.

Consider the case of Uber, which in 2016 sold its China operations to Didi. Back when the deal was announced, Uber got a 20 percent stake in Didi and $1 billion from Didi. As reported by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) back then, the swap came after Uber had put billions of dollars into its Chinese operations and opted instead to become one of the largest shareholders in Didi.

The old saying might apply here that if you cannot beat ’em, then join ’em — or at least buy a piece of them.

Back then, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick said, per WSJ, that buying a bit of Didi “frees up a substantial resources for bold initiatives focused on the future of cities — from self-driving technology to the future of food and logistics.”

Operating in China “is only possible with profitability. We were a young American business entering a country where most U.S. internet companies had failed to crack the code and with the product that needed rebuilding,” he said in that statement.

More recently the stake has been reduced to 12 percent as Uber sold down some of its holdings.

Sharing in Didi’s Fortunes

Twelve percent of a company being beset by regulatory woes and other pressures means that you get 12 percent of those pressures. You share in the losses as they accrue and as you maintain the stake. PYMNTS reported previously that Didi gets only a sliver of its sales (roughly 2 percent) from locations outside China. So that means there is very little diversification away from the headwinds of, say, being dropped from a WeChat or Alipay.

Uber, for its part, is grappling with its own issues. In the latest earnings presentation in May, the company said that its carrying value in Didi was worth $5.9 billion; it remains to be seen if there will be any writedowns in the next few quarters given the tumult surrounding Didi, which has seen its stock decline since its initial public offering (IPO) and which has been disappearing from app stores in China.

As PYMNTS noted in that earnings report, there are least some green shoots in the core mobility business, even as the company continues to pivot toward delivery. Delivery gross bookings were up about 166 percent in the most recent quarter, and total trips taken over the company’s platform were flat year over year. Uber continues to post net losses, at $108 million in the latest quarter, but the operating loss was $1.5 billion in that same quarter.

Bumpy roads lie ahead, at least for Uber’s exposure by proxy, of sorts, to China.

Risk Disclaimer

Fintech-Insight is dedicated to delivering unbiased and dependable insights into cryptocurrency, finance, trading, and stocks. However, we must clarify that we don't offer financial advice, and we strongly recommend users to perform their own research and due diligence.

Leave a Reply